| November/December
2001 |
|
|
Mr.
Flores's aneurysm was small and not in need of immediate repair. That
was fortunate, because soon after the attic incident, he had a stroke
and a recurrence of his gastric lymphoma. Dr. Peter Pappas-chief of
vascular surgery at University Hospital, an associate professor of surgery
at New Jersey Medical School, and Mr. Flores's surgeon-wanted to give
his patient time to become stronger before he operated. In
August 2001, the time was right for Mr. Flores's surgery. The question
was, which surgery was right for him? "High-risk patients like
Mr. Flores cause the surgeon to ask, 'Will this person be able to withstand
the toll traditional AAA repair takes on the body?'" says Dr. Pappas.
"It's a major abdominal surgery that has possible complications
of myocardial infarction, embolism, hemorrhaging, limb ischemia and
kidney failure. Afterward, there's usually a several-day hospital stay
followed by a two- to three-month recovery period." There
was another option for Mr. Flores: He qualified as a candidate for an
endovascular graft repair, a procedure that causes significantly less
stress on the body than traditional open surgery. During this technique,
the patient is given either local or general anesthesia. Special x-ray
imaging is used to guide a catheter from the femoral artery to the aneurysm
site in the aorta. Then, a polyester graft material is placed within
the aneurysm and held in place with stents. There are many benefits
to endovascular graft repair. Instead of a large abdominal incision,
there are two small incisions made in the groin; complications are significantly
reduced, as well. Patients typically are home one to two days after
the surgery and back to their routines in about one week. Weighing
the Alternatives With all of the advantages of endovascular graft
repair, there is something that patients must consider. The
leading complication of endovascular graft repair, says Dr. Pappas,
is an endoleak-a leakage of blood back into the aneurysm sac. "When
an endoleak occurs, the aneurysm is still pressurized, and there remains
a chance of rupture," says the surgeon. "Because there is
no way to predict if or when an endoleak will occur, patients must have
CT scans about every six months over a number of years. If an endoleak
is found, it can be repaired." Despite the possibility of endoleak,
he notes, many patients want to be evaluated for endovascular graft
repair because of the shorter hospital stay and recovery period. Ultimately,
a patient's anatomy can be the deciding factor as to which procedure
is used or even which endovascular device is chosen. As part of the
patient's evaluation, a specialized CT scan is taken to view the vascular
structure and the shape of the aneurysm. Those images help the surgeon
determine whether the patient is a good candidate for endovascular repair.
If an endovascular option is not possible, Dr. Pappas notes that traditional
surgery is often still an option which offers significant advantage
over endovascular repair. "Once the open surgery is successfully
completed, the AAA is repaired and doesn't require constant checks for
leakage," he says. "And yet, there are pros and cons for both
procedures. For patients considered high risk, the endovascular repair
offers greater benefits." For
more information about treatment of abdominal aneurysms or to make an
appointment with Dr. Pappas and his colleagues, call 1-800-827-2362
or (973) 972-9372. |
|