
|

Willie Croswell was a strong man with
a delicate heart. For more than 10 years, the former
Jersey City Public Works employee grappled with ischemic
heart disease, undergoing several catheterization and
angioplasty procedures to open blocked arteries.
On February 28, 2000, Mr. Croswell collapsed
at home and was taken to a local hospital. Ultimately,
another catheterization was attempted, but without success.
Now a candidate for triple bypass surgery, the 61-year-old
man was transferred to University Hospital.
"My doctor was confident that everything
was going to be okay," recalls Mr. Croswell. "I
woke up from the operation and thanked God I was still
alive. The next day, the nurse took me for a walk, and
then I knew everything was fine. I was no longer suffering
from the severe pain I used to have."
Unfortunately, people
suffering like Mr. Croswell aren't new to the New Jersey
Cardiovascular Institute (NJCI), where minimally invasive
coronary artery bypass surgeries are routinely performed.
Many patients referred to NJCI, for a variety of reasons,
are not prime candidates for bypass operations using
the heart-lung machine. "They might have lung disease
or a great amount of calcification in the heart,"
says Dr.
Barry Esrig, chief of the division of cardiothoracic
surgery at University Hospital, associate professor
of surgery at New Jersey Medical School, and assistant
clinical professor of surgery at Columbia University.
"These are patients who are high risk from the
perspective of stopping a weak heart that might not
be able to be restarted."
Dr. Esrig is one of the cardiac surgeons
at University Hospital's New Jersey Cardiovascular Institute
(NJCI) who performs what is known collectively as minimally
invasive cardiac surgery, although there are two different
procedures: Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB)
and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass
(MIDCAB).
To understand how these
newer surgeries work, it's helpful to know how most
bypass procedures have been done. For more than 30 years,
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the
gold standard procedure for patients with severe coronary
heart disease (CHD). In this "traditional"
surgery, an 8"-12" incision is made to open
the chest, and the patient is placed on a heart-lung
machine that takes over the body's breathing and blood
circulation functions while his or her own heart is
stopped. The surgeon then grafts an artery or vein,
typically taken from the patient's arm or thigh, onto
the heart, creating a detour for blood to flow through.
CABG has been a life-saving procedure for many patients,
says Dr. Esrig. The use of the heart-lung machine carries
the higher risk of post-operative stroke and other neurologic
complications especially cognitive deterioration in
addition to increased chance of kidney failure, and
requirement for blood transfusion, and pulmonary complications
requiring longer ICU stay. This difference is particularly
magnified in the management of very high-risk patients
where the life saving potential of the off pump revascularization
becomes evident. This was the subject of a recent presentation
from our institution presented at the International
Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (ISMICS)
in Munich,Germany. (To
read more about risks of the heart-lung machine, click
here.)
Advances
in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
Among surgeons in all specialties, there's
been a movement toward minimally invasive procedures.
These surgeries generally feature a smaller incision,
less pain, a shorter hospital stay, and a faster recovery
time than the traditional "open" procedures.
While some types of heart
operations are not conducive to off-pump techniques,
coronary bypass is. "The arteries are on the heart's
surface, so the surgeon doesn't need to gain access
to inside the cardiac chambers," says Dr. Esrig.
Using mechanical stabilizers, the skilled surgeon can
immobilize the small area of the heart where the bypass
graft should be placed without interfering with the
natural pumping action of the heart. With MIDCAB, which
is designed for single vessel bypass, the operation
is performed through a smaller incision while in OPCAB,
multiple bypasses are performed through the standard
incision. The benefits are typically a smaller scar
and a hospital stay of 4 to 5 days, as compared with
5 to 7 days for a traditional CABG. With both MIDCAB
and OPCAB, the primary benefit is avoiding the need
for a heart-lung machine and its associated complications.
Edward Minson, who had triple bypass, says he has difficulty
finding where the doctor made the incision. "If
it wasn't for a slight bulge where I have my pacemaker,
I couldn't find the incision."
Surgeons are able to operate on a beating
heart and perform the coronary bypass. "We can
stabilize the small area of the heart while we are working
on while the rest of the heart keeps pumping blood through
the body. With today's off-pump technique, all of the
coronary arteries can be by-passed without difficulty,"
says Dr. Esrig.
When OPCAB first was developed, questions
were raised about its efficacy: Does it do the job of
revascularization as well as CABG? Today, a decade later,
the answer appears to be yes. "So far, OPCAB appears
to have the same durable result as the traditional technique
[CABG], but with less
stress on the body," says Dr. Esrig.
Yet, there are times when off-pump or
"beating heart" bypass is not the best choice
for the patient. Each case must be decided individually,
but in general, says Dr. Esrig, when a younger patient
has small vessels and needs a multiple bypass or when
it's believed that the patient's heart will not tolerate
being moved about, it may be preferable to use the traditional
CABG technique.
And when OPCAB is being performed at
University Hospital, there is always a heart-lung machine
available to the surgeon, should a change in operating
strategy become necessary. "We're like a defensive
team, never sure what the circumstances will bring,
yet very good at adapting to what comes
our way," says Dr. Esrig.
In minimally invasive
heart surgery for valvular disease, where the use of
the heart and lung machine cannot be avoided, the focus
is on the smaller size of the incision and its functional
and cosmetic advantage. Adapted application heart and
lung machine through the peripheral vessels and the
use of special balloon tipped catheters, the heart can
be stopped and the operation can be performed through
a small incision using direct or endoscopic techniques.
What's
Best for the Patient
Society teaches us from an early age,
primarily through advertising, that "new"
and "improved" are always better. But that
line of thinking doesn't necessarily hold true when
it comes to medicine. The most desirable treatment is
the one that offers the best potential outcome with
the least risk to the patient.
"The missed opportunity
comes when the technique doesn't match the patient's
needs," says Dr. Esrig. "At NJCI, we have
a robust 'tool box' available to treat cardiac patients,
and doctors who are highly skilled at selecting and
using the right 'tools.' We are very focused on using
the least invasive technique whenever possible."
There is no "one size fits all"
approach to treating patients with CHD. For some people,
medicines such as statins, beta-blockers, nitrates,
or aspirin and other platelet inhibitors, combined with
an exercise program, dietary changes, and smoking cessation,
can be quite effective. In more advanced cases of CHD,
as arteries "harden," balloon catheterization
or stents may be used to open the blocked passageways.
And, for the most severe cases, coronary bypass–whether
by the CABG, OPCAB, or MIDCAB technique–may be
necessary.
NJCI doctors seek the
least invasive treatment possible–with possible
being the key word. "We don't see patients as having
suffered if they have not been able to have their bypass
done off pump," says Dr. Esrig. "Quite simply,
we don't do minimally invasive surgery for the sake
of doing so. We seek what is safest and best for the
patient."
For more
information on minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and
other cardiovascular health services, visit the NJCI
Web site: www.TheUniversityHospital.com/njci

|

|